Alasdair’s Engineering Pages © A. N. Beal 2016 www.anbeal.co.uk

www.anbeal.co.uk

BSP PILING FORMULA FOR BOTTOM-

Dynamic formulae for the capacity of driven piles have limited accuracy and should be used with caution, particularly for piles bearing on cohesive soil. However they can be useful in estimating pile hammer requirements to achieve the required resistance and monitoring variations of ground conditions on site. The BSP formula was empirically derived for bottom-

www.bsp-

BSP CASED PILES DATA SHEETS Note No. CP25

BSP CASED PILES -

ESTIMATION OF DRIVING RESISTANCE

The following empirical dynamic formula is based on the results of experience to date:

Ru = 290W(1.0 + h)/(S + 12.7)

where

Ru = Ultimate driving resistance (tonnes)

W = Weight of internal drop hammer (tonnes)

h = ACTUAL drop at final set (metres)

S = Final set (millimetres per blow)

The formula is APPLICABLE ONLY FOR:

- Drops between 1.2 and 2 metres (vertical piles)
- Sets less than 5mm per blow (i.e. more than 5 blows per 25mm)

NOTES

1. This formula should be used only for piles driven to soils such as sand, gravel, rock, hard marl, or very stiff clay.

2. A re-

3. The Formula stated above is only applicable where the driving has been carried out exactly in accordance with the recommendations set out in the latest issue of BSP Note No. CP3 ‘Installation of Casings’.

4. When measuring the final set for application of the formula, it is essential to ensure that the hammer rope is not ‘snatched’ before the hammer has completed its full drop -

5. The formula stated above is applicable to vertical piles and in the case of raking piles an appropriate adjustment to the value of the set and/or drop should be made.

6. Owing to the limitations of dynamic pile driving formulae it is generally advisable to test load one or more piles (depending on the size of the contract), particularly when the piles are founded in soils such as stiff clay, chalk, etc.

7. Refer to BSP Note No. CP3 Para. 9 regarding uplifting of piles.

8. Separate checks should be made regarding matters such as the overall stability of the whole group of piles supporting a structure, the possibility of settlement due to a soft stratum existing below the piles, negative friction due to consolidation of an upper soft stratum, and so on. (Refer to Code of Practice ‘Foundations’-

Note No. CP26

The table below is based on the empirical dynamic formula in CP 25 which must be referred to. The details given on this sheet are only applicable under the certain definite conditions stated on CP25.

Working Hammer Drop Loads W h

Notes

1. Figures in brackets (-

2. Working load is obtained by dividing Ru (Ultimate Driving Resistance) by Factor of Safety, which is normally 2.

Dia. |
Working Load |
Hammer |
Drop |
Ultimate |
Driving |

(mm) |
(tonnes) |
(t) |
(m) |
5 Blows/ 25mm |
10 Blows/ 25mm |

254 |
15 |
0.75 |
1.20 |
27 |
31 |

305 |
30 |
1.25 |
1.20 |
45 |
52 |

356 |
40 |
2 |
1.20 |
72 82 |
84 |

406 |
50 |
2.5 |
1.20 |
90 |
105 |

457 |
65 |
3 |
1.20 |
108 |
126 |

508 |
80 |
4 |
1.20 |
144 |
168 |

559 |
100 |
5 |
1.20 |
180 |
210 |

610 |
120 (- |
6 |
1.20 |
216 |
252 |